Revision assistant
Compares versions and prepares the affected edits and the questions a reviewer must answer.
The saved work
A material-change assessment for review
Observed change: R1, the decision to propose workstream-A mobilisation, moved from blocked because the required assurance record was not received to ready because it was reported received. The evidence text changed. This is a candidate for professional materiality judgement, not an automatic finding that the underlying assurance is valid, that authority exists, or that advice, a commitment, or a release should be rewritten.
Unaffected issues: R2 is classified unchanged and remains an undecided scope choice with no client instruction. R4 is unchanged and remains a proposed but unconfirmed meeting window. R3 is uncertain, not a change finding: validation remains unobserved and technical evidence missing. These issues may shape questions for the competent steering process, but do not establish changed contract scope, client demand, rights, payment, tooling, meeting acceptance, or programme outcome. Unknown remains unknown.
A related local example. It shows the stated part of the work, not every step in this design. Read it in saved outputs
- What it works from
- Old/new sources; output dependencies; report versions
- What it prepares
- Change-impact pack and editable suggested revisions
- Who keeps the decision
- Author and accountable reviewer
- Where its responsibility ends
- Unknown dependency coverage remains visible; consequential changes invalidate affected review state.
Part of a larger job
A responsibility can contribute to several workflows. Each one names the inputs, the human decision and the next handover.