A citation alone does not make a claim correct. See how the Quality Checker compares the number, population and source version, with a reason for every item returned.
Working browser demonstration · Fictional sources · Local rules, no live agent
Compare the proposed output with the original evidence and explain each discrepancy. The prepared output still needs human review.
WHAT GOES IN
A proposed claim and the original evidence it is supposed to describe.
WHAT COMES OUT
A discrepancy report showing what matches, what fails and why.
WHO DECIDES
The named reviewer decides whether to correct or issue the work. A clean check is not professional sign-off.
Expected outcome to test
Fewer unsupported figures or population claims reaching final sign-off.
The demo uses fictional inputs. The Blueprint establishes a client baseline; installation is separately scoped.
01 / TRY THE JOB
Prepare the output. Inspect the evidence.
Compare a current claim with a stale 60% headline. Read the arithmetic and population checks separately. Set the input and select “Prepare this result”. Then read the output before recording a fictional review.
80240
Changing an input starts a fresh example.
ALLOWED INPUTS
Read-only comparison; a discrepancy report is never professional sign-off.
PREPARED OUTPUT
A discrepancy report showing what matches, what fails and why.
HUMAN REVIEW
The named reviewer decides whether to correct or issue the work. A clean check is not professional sign-off.
Ready to prepare
Compare a proposed headline with the original table. Inspect the number, sample and permission separately, with a reason for every discrepancy.
THE TASK
Check the claim against its source
Compare a proposed headline with the original table. Inspect the number, sample and permission separately, with a reason for every discrepancy.
For your firm
Compare the proposed output with the original evidence and explain each discrepancy.
Start with
A permitted example of this repeated task and the source material the case is allowed to use.
Your people keep
The named reviewer decides whether to correct or issue the work. A clean check is not professional sign-off.
Start with the surrounding paid service, not a preselected agent. A Fit Call can identify the useful next check before any design or build.
Have one service and a recent engagement in mind. No confidential files or formal preparation.
From this example to a working capability
A paid Firm Capacity Blueprint maps one important revenue path, fully designs three connected opportunities and their shared controls, ranks the first installation and includes a decision review. Installation is separately scoped and quoted. This fictional demonstration is not an installed product or a quote.
Local fictional example · 0 recorded events · Revision 1
02 / THE ROLE’S SOURCE PACK
Check the source behind the answer.
These fictional originals belong to the selected case. Compare the output with the source, version and allowed use. Showing a source here does not clear missing evidence or grant wider access.
Original fictional survey table
PUB-SAMPLEVersion 1
Synthetic source. The adjustable N is completed responses, a whole number from 80 to 240 (default 120). Exactly 36 answered yes to repeated evidence requests in simulation week 1; N minus 36 answered no. These categories exhaust the sample. Rate = 100 × 36 / N; display one decimal place. This is invented data, not public research.
Use boundary: Fictional aggregate data may be quoted with the sample, period and synthetic label.
Sample-bounded claim template
PUB-CLAIMVersion 1
Synthetic source. Proposed text: In this fictional week-1 sample, 36 of N respondents (100 × 36 / N percent, rounded to one decimal) reported repeated evidence requests. Retain the denominator and invented-sample qualifier. One numerical claim requires editorial review.
Use boundary: Synthetic fixture; private review within this fictional case only.
Superseded pilot headline — exception
PUB-CLAIM-OLDVersion 0
Synthetic source. The old headline reads: 60% of advisory firms repeat evidence requests. Its 36 / 60 pilot denominator belongs to a different fictional sample. It is not the current N, and the phrase advisory firms overstates the population. Keep this source only to inspect the discrepancy.
Use boundary: Comparison only; this stale headline is not cleared for publication.
Editorial and distribution brief
PUB-EDITORIALVersion 1
Synthetic source. Use the survey statement, show the no-response category as N minus 36, and ask where repeated requests occur. Do not invent a client story. The proposed channel is an internal example newsletter. Publication, audience consent, delivery, responses and any enquiry attribution have no receipts in this demo; each remains pending its owner.
Use boundary: Synthetic fixture; private review within this fictional case only.
SEE THE WHOLE HANDOFF
See who needs this output next.
Run the connected case to see what arrives before this step, who reviews its output and what happens when the next owner returns it.
Bring the task, its current owner and where it gets stuck to a no-fee Firm Capacity Fit Call. If a paid Firm Capacity Blueprint is useful, it measures one important revenue path and fully designs three connected improvements. Roles are chosen for those designs. Installation is separately scoped; pricing is quote-specific.
Paid Blueprint: 14 calendar days after complete delivery and decision review to request the fee back; refund within five business days. You keep the design. Installation has separate agreed tests and terms. Read the full guarantee ↗