The first installation is the highest-ranked capability from your Blueprint, scoped and quoted on its own. We agree its start, accepted end state, owners, permitted sources, human decision points, exceptions and recovery before taking a deposit; test it against representative cases; train your operators; and obtain written acceptance. Thirty calendar days of in-scope stabilisation follow. It is not an installation of the whole firm-wide path, and nothing continues automatically afterwards.
The agreed workflow carries permitted inputs, prepared work, named review and a traceable accepted record.
Every layer is configured around the agreed workflow, actual access and named responsibilities. A feature is not complete merely because it can generate an answer.
The installation is the controlled path and its operating evidence. The exact applications, agent components and integrations follow the approved Blueprint and separate SOW. Components needed for one accepted workflow are included in its installation quote, rather than billed again as standalone agents.
A named trigger, accepted inputs, required fields, accountable owner and explicit exclusions open each case.
The workflow retrieves only permitted sources and keeps source, version, date, owner and approval state attached.
Rules handle deterministic steps. AI retrieves, compares, structures and prepares only where probabilistic work adds value.
Consequential professional, commercial and client decisions route to a person who can correct, reject or approve.
Sources, AI contribution, human changes, exceptions, decision, version and approved destination remain inspectable.
Each reusable claim carries an owner, permitted use, currency state and the event that invalidates it—so drift surfaces between pursuits instead of at the next deadline.
Monitoring, failure handling, access, rollback, ownership and change control are defined before the system is left to run.
These examples show how the agreed work can change. We establish your actual starting point during the Blueprint and test the proposed improvement against it.
A person searches folders, asks colleagues and copies the nearest example.
A prompt starts from whatever context the user remembers to provide.
A trigger opens a case with approved sources, context, owner and missing inputs visible.
Contributors rebuild structure and repeat low-value assembly under deadline.
Fluent material appears quickly, but its source and applicability may be unclear.
AI prepares within the accepted playbook and keeps evidence beside the working material.
Senior review becomes archaeology, correction and late-stage rescue.
A person must discover what the model assumed and which claims need checking.
The named reviewer sees sources, uncertainty, changes and the exact decision waiting for them.
Missing evidence is often discovered late or carried forward as an assumption.
The answer may remain plausible even when the required basis is absent.
The case stops visibly, preserves context and routes the exception to its owner.
The final file separates from the decisions and commitments that shaped it.
The chat or draft is the endpoint.
The accepted record writes approved facts, owners and commitments into the agreed operating path.
Responsibility depends on custom, memory and who happens to be available.
Human review is stated broadly but the retained decision is rarely named.
Each consequential transition names who prepares, who decides and what evidence proves completion.
Acceptance proves the installed behaviour against agreed test material. It does not promise a market outcome or replace professional judgement.
Agreed test cases move through the intended stages and reach the approved destination with required context intact.
The system does not disguise a missing source, required field or unavailable authority as a complete answer.
The person authorised to decide can inspect, correct, reject or approve before consequential writeback.
Inputs, sources, AI contribution, human changes, exceptions, version and final state remain traceable.
Launch-readiness target: Agreed in the installation quote after the actual scope, access and representative test material are known. No standard build duration is promised for the broader package. Client delays, changed requirements and third-party restrictions enter dependency or change control.
The engagement separates system accountability from the client, market, professional and provider decisions that remain outside Build n Bloom’s control.
Build n Bloom demonstrates the in-scope workflow, safe stops, permissions, review path, writeback and evidence against the accepted test plan.
No guarantee of revenue, win rate, adoption, professional correctness, autonomous submission, client action or third-party availability.
Before the deposit, agree the starting input, accepted end result, included components, integrations, exclusions, fixed fee, delivery date, client participation and restoration plan. Required software and provider costs are identified separately.
Use the agreed representative examples, including missing evidence and failure cases. Your named reviewer inspects the results. Payment, use or silence does not replace written acceptance; the remaining balance is due on that acceptance.
If the core job fails its agreed tests, we correct and retest within ten business days after receiving the agreed evidence and access. If it still fails, you can stop and receive the installation fees paid and associated Blueprint fee back, subject to the published terms and no duplicate refund. The agreed restoration and handover are included.
Read correction, delay and refund terms →Thirty calendar days of in-scope stabilisation follow written acceptance. New workflows, sources, permissions and integrations require separate scope. Shared setup is costed once; a later installation quotes only the incremental work needed for its own accepted output.
A production installation follows only when the Blueprint supports the economics, access, control boundary and acceptance plan. A standalone agent is a separate purchase only when it has a distinct accepted output and responsibility beyond an included workflow component.
