Records to inspect
Signed scope, permissioned case pack, versioned evidence register, approved method, review and client acceptance receipts.
C2 · DEL.1 → DEL.2.W01 → DEL.3 → DEL.4 → DEL.6.W01 · Example design
Connect permitted sources, an approved method, professional review and the client's acceptance record.
Typical sponsor: Practice lead and qualified reviewer. This is an illustrative route. It is not an installed workflow or a promise that this path is one of your three Blueprint designs.
Select any stage to inspect what it receives and produces, which specialist role might assist, what it may access, and who makes the human decision.
Scroll the diagram horizontally, or use the stage buttons below.
Engagement lead owns this step.
Return path: Reviewer rejects findings sends work from Issue draft to Traceable analysis.
Missing evidence or permission at DEL.2 returns to the evidence owner or stops the case; it never becomes a silent complete pack.
Client correction or dispute at DEL.6 returns to the engagement lead at DEL.4 for a controlled revision or formal resolution.
Net scarce-role time per accepted output may improve if source work and corrections fall without weakening quality.
Signed scope, permissioned case pack, versioned evidence register, approved method, review and client acceptance receipts.
Missing or conflicting evidence, wrong tenant or unsupported conclusion stops work; rejected evidence or draft returns to its owner.
Test ordinary, missing/conflicting, permission, wrong period, injection, tool failure, revocation and reviewer-return cases.
These roles are candidate responsibilities in the reference architecture. They are not prebuilt products or active agents in your systems.
Check one authorised case against its agreed intake list.
Boundary: Only the case workspace and signed scope; unexpected restricted material stops intake.
Show the next owner, dependency or proposed follow-up.
Boundary: One current case state; routine effects require separate delegation and receipt.
Find current permissioned internal sources for one case and question.
Boundary: Case-scoped internal search; no public-web egress or cross-client corpus.
Compare a draft with the original permitted evidence and exact request.
Boundary: Read-only comparison; a discrepancy report is never professional sign-off.
Apply an approved calculation or comparison method.
Boundary: Validated inputs and authorised workpapers; no invented method or conclusion.
Investigate one approved public question.
Boundary: Sanitised brief and public sources only; no confidential case context.
Prepare an article, proposal or client section from approved findings.
Boundary: Approved template, claims and versioned sources; draft remains private until review.
A Blueprint starts with a service the firm already sells, examines permitted records and measures the constrained work. It selects three connected boundaries, designs each to the same depth and ranks the first installation. A reference path may change, narrow or be rejected when the evidence is different.
Inspect the System Blueprint ↗